Depictive and Resultative Constructions in Hatam

Authors

  • Fiona Djunita Natalia Luhulima English Department, Papua University, West Papua, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59890/ijir.v4i5.187

Keywords:

Hatam, Secondary Predication, Depictive Constructions, Resultative Constructions

Abstract

This paper examines depictive and resultative constructions in Hatam, a Papuan language spoken in the Bird’s Head region of West Papua, Indonesia. The study investigates how secondary predication is syntactically encoded and how multiple predicates interact within a single clause. The data were collected from three native speakers through elicitation sessions and naturally occurring speech and were analyzed using a qualitative descriptive approach. The findings show that Hatam exhibits flexible secondary predication structures in which adjectives, verbs, and adverbs may function as depictive or resultative predicates. Depictive constructions display structural ambiguity because descriptive elements may attach either to noun phrases or to clause-level predicates, resulting in multiple interpretations. Three major types of depictive constructions are identified: (1) adjectives modifying nouns and (2) adjectives modifying nouns while completing the clause predicate. Resultative constructions involve two interacting predicates that together form a complex predicate expressing a causal relationship between an event and its resulting state. This study contributes to the grammatical description of Hatam and provides additional empirical data for typological studies of secondary predication in Papuan languages

References

Bowers, J. 1993 The syntax of predication. Linguistic Inquiry 24, 591-656.

Bowers, J. 1997 A binary analysis of resultatives. Texas Linguistics Forum 38, 43-58.

Bowers, J. 2000 Predication. M. Baltin & C. Collins (eds.) The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory. Blackwell. 299-333.

Celi, Tabulo & Paris. 2021. Acceptability of the English Resultative and Depictive Construction by Spanish Native Speakers Learning EFL. Fresno: California State University.

Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Eberhard, D. M., Simons, G. F., & Fennig, C. D. (Eds.). (2025). Hatam. In Ethnologue: Languages of the World (28th ed.). SIL International. https://www.ethnologue.com/language/had/

Halliday, M.A.K. 1967. Notes on transitivity and theme in English, part 1. Journal of Linguistics 3:37-81.

Holton, Gary & Marian Klamer. 2018. The Papuan languages of East Nusantara and the Bird’s Head. Annual Review of Linguistics, 4, 151–174.

Hornstein, N. 1999 Movement and Control, Linguistic Inquiry 30, 69-96.

Hornstein, N. 2001 Move! A Minimalist Theory of Construal. Blackwell, Massachusetts.

Hornstein, N. & D. Lightfoot 1987 Predication and PRO. Language 63: 23-52.

Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the Syntax–Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 2005. Argument Realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Reesink, Ger. 2002. Languages of the Eastern Bird’s Head. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.

Rothstein, Susan. 2004. Structuring Events: A Study in the Semantics of Lexical Aspect. Oxford: Blackwell

Downloads

Published

2026-06-07

Issue

Section

Articles