The Dynamics of Economic Structure in Aceh Tamiang Regency and Its Implications for Sectoral Competitiveness

Authors

  • Rahmilia Hadiyani Universitas Syiah Kuala, Aceh
  • Darlis Azis Universitas Syiah Kuala, Aceh
  • Haikal Syauqan UIN Ar-Raniry, Aceh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59890/ijbmp.v4i2.230

Keywords:

Shift Share, Economic Structure, Sectoral Competitiveness, Location Quotient, Aceh Tamiang

Abstract

This study analyzes the dynamics of Aceh Tamiang Regency’s economic structure during 2020–2024 and its implications for sectoral competitiveness using classical shift-share analysis (Dunn, 1960), decomposing GRDP growth into the regional share (Ns), proportional shift (Ps), and differential shift (Ds), complemented by Location Quotient (LQ) analysis to identify base sectors. Results show that Aceh Tamiang’s economy grew by 11.07 percent, slower than Aceh Province’s 16.87 percent, reducing the regency’s contribution to provincial GRDP from 4.57 to 4.34 percent. Both Ps and Ds were negative (IDR -120.16 billion and IDR -228.70 billion), reflecting a sectoral structure dominated by slow-growing industries and weak local competitiveness. Only the Other Services sector is progressive (Quadrant I), while Agriculture, Forestry, and Fishery, the largest base sector (LQ 1.43), falls into Quadrant IV (lagging). Trade, Transportation and Warehousing, and Information and Communication show a favorable industry mix but weak competitiveness (Quadrant II). These findings underscore the urgency of structural transformation and productivity strengthening in base sectors, particularly downstream diversification of agricultural and mining outputs, to prevent Aceh Tamiang from falling further behind Aceh Province’s aggregate growth.

References

Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Aceh Tamiang. (2025). Produk Domestik Regional Bruto Kabupaten Aceh Tamiang menurut Lapangan Usaha, 2020–2024. BPS Kabupaten Aceh Tamiang.

Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Aceh. (2025). Produk Domestik Regional Bruto Provinsi Aceh menurut Lapangan Usaha, 2020–2024. BPS Provinsi Aceh.

Barff, R. A., & Knight, P. L. (1988). Dynamic shift-share analysis. Growth and Change, 19(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.1988.tb00465.x

Dunn, E. S., Jr. (1960). A statistical and analytical technique for regional analysis. Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, 6, 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5597.1960.tb01705.x

Esteban-Marquillas, J. M. (1972). A reinterpretation of shift-share analysis. Regional and Urban Economics, 2(3), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-3331(72)90033-4

Houston, D. B. (1967). The shift and share analysis of regional growth: A critique. Southern Economic Journal, 33(4), 577–581. https://doi.org/10.2307/1055653

https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i4.1378

Isard, W. (1960). Methods of regional analysis: An introduction to regional science. MIT Press.

Isserman, A. M. (1977). The Location Quotient approach to estimating regional economic impacts. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 43(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944367708977758

Khusaini, M. (2015). A shift-share analysis on regional competitiveness: A case of Banyuwangi district, East Java, Indonesia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, 738–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.097

Krugman, P. R. (1991). Geography and trade. MIT Press.

Loveridge, S., & Selting, A. C. (1998). A review and comparison of shift-share identities. International Regional Science Review, 21(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/016001769802100102

Lv, D., Gao, H., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Rural economic development based on shift-share analysis in a developing country: A case study in Heilongjiang Province, China. Sustainability, 13(4), 1969. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041969

Montanía, C. V., Fernández-Núñez, T., & Hewings, G. J. D. (2024). Toward a more comprehensive shift-share analysis: An illustration using regional data. Growth and Change, 55(1), e12693. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12693

Nazara, S., & Hewings, G. J. D. (2004). Spatial structure and taxonomy of decomposition in shift-share analysis. Growth and Change, 35(4), 476–490. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.2004.00258.x

Nurlina, Andiny, P., & Muda, I. (2023). Development strategy for disadvantaged regions based on leading sectors in the Eastern Aceh region. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(4), e01378.

Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Free Press.

Published

2026-07-31

Issue

Section

Articles