Digital Pragmatics in Medan City: An Analysis of Meaning in Social Media, Emojis, Memes, and Multimodal Communication

Authors

  • Muhammad Natsir Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Elizabeth Hutapea Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Lyra Manullang Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Ristama Hutabalian Universitas Negeri Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59890/ijir.v4i3.152

Keywords:

Digital Pragmatics, Cyberpragmatics, Multimodal Communication, Emoji, Meme, Illocutionary Force, Digital Politeness

Abstract

The transformation of communication in the era of social media has significantly reshaped the ways individuals construct, negotiate, and interpret meaning through the integration of text, emojis, and memes as increasingly dominant multimodal practices in everyday interaction. This phenomenon is socially and culturally relevant as it influences patterns of social relations, identity expression, and politeness strategies within digital spaces that transcend hierarchical boundaries and community divisions. This study aims to explore how pragmatic meaning is constructed and negotiated in digital communication through the use of emojis and memes. Employing a qualitative case study approach, the research involved fifteen active social media users with backgrounds as university students and young professionals. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observations of digital interactions, and documentation analysis of social media conversations, and were analyzed using thematic analysis within the frameworks of cyberpragmatics and multimodal discourse analysis. The findings reveal three dominant patterns: emojis as regulators and shifters of illocutionary force, emojis as digital politeness strategies within hierarchical relationships, and memes as media for the production of collective implicatures grounded in irony and shared social experience. These findings demonstrate that meaning in digital communication is inferential, relational, and multimodally distributed. Theoretically, this study contributes to the development of digital pragmatics by reconstructing the concept of illocution within technology-mediated communication, while also offering practical implications for digital literacy and language education in understanding meaning-making dynamics in contemporary online spaces

References

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.

Caspi, A. (2025). Using emojis that alter the meaning of written messages. Communication Research Reports. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2025.xxxxxx

Dynel, M. (2021). COVID-19 memes going viral: On the multiple multimodal voices behind face masks. Discourse & Society, 32(2), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926520970385

Flores-Salgado, E., & Witten, M. (2023). Illocutionary force and emoji use in WhatsApp interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 210, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.02.004

Ge, J., & Gretzel, U. (2023). Emoji as relational work in online communication. Journal of Pragmatics, 210, 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.02.006

Georgakopoulou, A. (2021). Narrative and identity in social media. Narrative Inquiry, 31(2), 322–347. https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.20041.geo

Gharbi, I., AbuDaabes, A., Al-Kilani, M. H., & Ismail, W. S. (2025). Speaking the right digital language: How post format and communication impact university Facebook engagement. Administrative Sciences, 15(8), Article 310. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15080310

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press.

Huang, Y. (2022). Pragmatics in the digital age: Relevance, inference and online communication. Intercultural Pragmatics, 19(4), 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2022-4003

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2021). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003099857

Liang, L. (2026). A study on the pragmatic functions of emojis in Chinese consumers’ digital reviews. Sinología Hispánica: China Studies Review.

Lupton, D. (2021). Contextualizing COVID-19 memes: Digital humour in a global crisis. Information, Communication & Society, 24(5), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1772778

Riordan, M. A. (2021). Emojis as tools for emotion work in text-based communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, Article 106618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106618

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.

Tagg, C., Seargeant, P., & Brown, A. (2021). Taking offense on social media: Conviviality and communication on Facebook. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74880-1

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

Yus, F. (2022). Pragmatics of emoji use in digital interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 196, 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.05.005

Zeng, W. (2023). Pragmatic functions of emoji on Chinese social media. EP Publication.

Zhang, Y., & Cassany, D. (2022). Multimodal discourse in social media: Meaning-making in digital communication. Discourse, Context & Media, 48, Article 100612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2022.100612

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

Issue

Section

Articles